Tom Watson has said ‘mob rule’ must not decide public contracts. Perhaps he should take a look at his new employer What a world we live in. Imagine: gangs dragging civil servants off commuter trains and beating them up because they handed government data jobs to the wrong contractor – and the government is changing its procurement decisions as a result.
Also readBarriers facing black and south Asian music events ‘cost London up to £141m a year’
Well, OK, it might not have happened yet, but it’s only a matter of time. As the former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson asks : “Do you want to let the rule of law lead procurement practice, or do you want mob rule to lead procurement practices?” No, I absolutely don’t want the latter, and it’s always good to get ahead of trouble.
But then I remember there are two common meanings of mob rule. One is intimidation by crowds of thugs. The other is a pejorative term for democracy. And while I’ve yet to see government procurement practices in the UK determined by pitchforks and flaming torches, democratic transparency could be a genuine threat to certain contractors.
Also readUK will not put tariffs on Chinese vehicles, says Jonathan Reynolds
One might have hoped that Watson, who once took on the Murdoch empire , would have recognised the distinction. But then again, one might have hoped that Watson would not have taken a job as a senior vice-president at Palantir. Continue reading...
